They were never quite my favourite band, but were always there or thereabouts
In Legend of the Fall: Mark E Smith kept swinging to the end, Dave Simpson sums things up well. đ”
The Fallen
2018 is working hard to be the new 2016. First Ursula Le Guin; now Mark E Smith has been taken from us.
The Fall were one of the great bands, no matter what lineup. Itâs just sad that the last time I saw them, about two years ago, they were terrible.
Sadder, of course, that Smith is dead.
So it goes.
The science-fiction community is dispossessed tonight. Ursula K Le Guin RIP.
Star Doctors
It was drawn to my attention a couple of weeks ago that I have not yet expressed (publicly) an opinion on either Star Wars: The Last Jedi or the Doctor Who Christmas special. That is both true, and very remiss of me. Trouble is itâs now been quite a while since I saw them both.
Still, I should be able to gather together a few memory cells.
The Last Jedi
I went on opening night, as I microblogged. It was great. There are some points that could have been done differently, or left out, or speeded up; and it had the weird effect towards the end of there being a series of times when I thought it was finished, and it still wasnât. But all in all a fine work. Not as good as The Force Awakens, maybe. But thatâs partly because that one raised our expectations so high.
âTwice Upon A Timeâ
Peter Capaldiâs last episode. It was damn fine, loads of fun. Great to see Bill back, even if not exactly. Unnecessary Daleks, but quite a good use of them â or âit,â I should say.
And the introduction of âTestimony,â scooping up peopleâs memories and saving them, is great. Though how many computer-simulated afterlives can one series have?
And what a dramatic start Jodie Whittakerâs Doctor is going to have.
There you go, only a month or so after the events.
Too Like the Lightning by Ada Palmer (Books 2018, 1)
The worst thing about this book is that it tells you, two or three chapters from the end, that itâs only the first half of the story. Now, I knew there are two other books in the series, but I expected the first book to be at least capable of standing alone. Turns out it isnât: the ending leaves us hanging right after the big reveal.
The other worst thing about this book is that Iâm not really that compelled to read on. I mean, I probably will, but itâs not like when I read Hyperion, say, and had to scurry around the city trying to find a copy of the second volume.1
After all the fuss about it not being published in the UK, and me not being able to get it, I had high expectations. Probably too high, as it turns out.
Donât get me wrong: itâs by no means a bad book, and itâs astonishingly accomplished for a first novel. I did enjoy reading it. Its true weakest pointâ ignore all that complaining above â is that it can be a little bit hard to understand the world she creates. Not impossible, though, and Palmer does go to some efforts to explain it with minimal infodumping. Or at least with infodumping disguised as a conversation with the reader, which works quite well.
Itâs about four hundred years in the future, and since the Church War some two hundred or so earlier, the world no longer exists as countries in the way that we know them. Instead people are members of one of seven âhives,â which they can choose to align themselves with at majority. Or not: some people are hiveless by choice.
Countries mean less at least in part because of super-fast international transport by âcars,â which I think are probably suborbital rockets or similar. Though they may have a more advanced propulsion system. The most confusing thing is probably that the leaders of the seven hives are characters and each of them has several names. For any given one of them, each of the others might know them by a different nickname, and the narrator uses these interchangeably. It gets hard to keep track of whoâs who.
Global warming appears to have been conquered, or ameliorated to the point where itâs not a major concern. In fact it seems to be very close to a post-scarcity society. People only work at things they want to, and seem to be able to live OK without having to work.
Apart from âServicers,â that is. Our narrator, Mycroft Canner, is one of these. People convicted of sufficiently serious crimes can end up as one of these. They are essentially public slaves. They are required to work for seemingly anyone who asks them, and are paid in food and board â and occasionally other treats such as cinema tickets. But they have no other way to get these things.
I found it quite a disturbing an idea; though it would almost certainly be better than being in prison; and at least they donât have the death penalty.
Thatâs not the most disturbing thing in the book. But Iâll say no more about that.
As I write about it, my estimation of it is going up. Isnât that strange? If I write enough about it Iâll probably stop to download Seven Surrenders, the next volume.
Oh, yes, as I said, it says itâs âthe first halfâ of Cannerâs story; but there are two more volumes. Are they both short, or is the third one more standalone? Thereâs only one way to find out.
But I have a stack of other things to read first. Also I realise I have no idea what the title has to do with the story. đ
- If memory serves: it was a long time ago, and it may not have happened exactly like that. â©
Clarke Kickstarted
The Kickstarter for the Arthur C Clarke Award is already fully funded, but now theyâre pushing for a stretch goal.
What you get already is pretty good: an anthology of original SF stories of exactly 2001 words each, by a host of great names including past Clarke winners.
But the stretch goal adds a specially-commissioned soundtrack, which is a great idea.
Why are you still reading this? Go and sign up.
Maybe this change to Facebookâs feed will take it back towards just showing what family and friends post, as I was asking for back in October.
My guess is it still wonât give us what we want: all the things our Friends post, in reverse-chronological order.
If only there were a special word that described posts presented in that way⊠or a special protocol, or feed format, that made it easy to share the postsâŠ
Lana, What?
Turns out Lana Del Rey was⊠mistaken? about Radiohead having brought a lawsuit against her. After me leaping to her defence. Iâm very disappointed.
Amanda Petrusich, writing in The New Yorker, tells us:
Eventually, Warner/Chappell*, Radioheadâs publisher at the time of the songâs release, refuted her claim: âItâs clear that the verses of âGet Freeâ use musical elements found in the verses of âCreepâ and weâve requested that this be acknowledged in favor of all writers of âCreep,â â the company said in a statement. âTo set the record straight, no lawsuit has been issued and Radiohead have not said they âwill only accept 100%â of the publishing of âGet Free.â â
Which seems fairly clear. Read the whole article, though. Itâs interesting.
I love that, on Touch Bar MacBooks, you can set things up so that you use your fingerprint to authorise sudo in the Terminal.
I Never Thought I'd See the Day...
When Gmail launched several years ago offering a free gigantic storage plan of, I think, 1 gigabyte, it seemed impossible that anyone could ever fill that much space with email. Since then, of course, the free allowance has quietly grown and grown. So too has the volume of email, and the average size of individual emails.
Until today, when I see this:

99% of 15 GB. Whoops! Of course, seven years of using it as a repository for daily backups from WordPress will do that. (Itâs not the most elegant of backup solutions, but itâs easy and it works.) I deleted everything before 2017 and now itâs down to 60%.
Crazy Copyright Claim
Gotta say I hope Radiohead (or their lawyers) lose this case:
Pop star Lana Del Rey says sheâs being sued by Radiohead for copying their breakthrough single, âCreep.â
Iâm not a fan of Lana Del Rey, but I just listened to her song, âGet Free,â and the only similarity is the chord progression in the first verse. You canât claim copyright in a chord progression. Or if you can, you shouldnât be able to.
If the chords and the melody were the same, theyâd have a point, but even then apparently they want 100% of the publishing royalties; donât the words count? Del Rey has offered them 40%, and I think thatâs way too much.
Iâm amused that the album containing the song gets its title from a doubtless much better one by the same name: Lust for Life. Thereâs no copyright in titles, of course.
2017 in Bitface Blogging
Well hello. It’s been a while. That daily posting thing didn’t work too well in the latter part of the year, and was particularly weak in the last couple of weeks. Weak weeks.
In fact I posted 261 times in 2017. It’s surprisingly hard to find that kind of thing out from Wordpress itself. I had to dig into the database and run some simple SQL:
select count(*) from devilgate_posts
where post_status = 'publish'
and post_type = 'post'
and post_date_gmt like '2017%';
261 is 72% of the days of the year, which is not too bad. Certainly the most posts in any year out of the past fifteen(!)
Here’s the monthly breakdown:
| Month | Posts |
|---|---|
| Jan | 32 |
| Feb | 33 |
| Mar | 33 |
| Apr | 18 |
| May | 27 |
| Jun | 15 |
| Jul | 21 |
| Aug | 17 |
| Sep | 18 |
| Oct | 18 |
| Nov | 23 |
| Dec | 6 |
A strong start, tapering off in the middle, with a rally in November and then a complete collapse in December. I suspect the last is from a combination of post-nano slump and the festive season.
If you’re interested, here’s the SQL that got me that table:
select
date_format(post_date_gmt, '%b') as Month,
count(*) as Posts
from devilgate_posts
where post_status = 'publish'
and post_type = 'post'
and post_date_gmt like '2017%'
group by date_format(post_date_gmt, '%m');
As to this year, we’ll see how it goes. I hope at least to keep the frequency reasonably high. And improve both code and table formatting.
Liked: In âStar Wars: The Last Jedi,â Luke Skywalker Finally Becomes Cool | The New Yorker
Lukeâs diminished circumstances make for a far richer character, one whom Hamill portrays with mournful energy and depth. For the first time, Hamillâs performance is one of the best parts of a âStar Warsâ movie.
I canât really agree with this article more. Except maybe the bit about the wink.
Mouse Takes Fox
The news that Murdoch plans to sell 21st Century Fox and Sky TV to Disney is interesting for how it will reshape the media landscape. But itâs good from my point of view for a number of reasons, some relatively trivial and to do with content consumption; and one big.
- The X-Men and the Fantastic Four will come under the control of Marvel Studios. Just in time for Infinity War. Well, of course, far too late â even, I would imagine, for Infinity War Part 2. I expect thatâs at least planned by now.
- Even more trivial, Lucasfilm can put the Fox fanfare back at the start of future Star Wars movies (and add them in to future reissues of the recent ones).
- It will become ethical to watch Sky TV. More of which below.
Above all: better Disney than Murdoch.1
Will Disney own too much? Hell yes. But see above.
On the ethics of watching â and paying for â Sky TV: see this blog passim for my thoughts on that. Like here and here. If Sky had not been owned by Murdoch we might conceivably have got it in the past. But I feel weâre highly unlikely to get it now. Buying a dish in 2017 would just be weird, and our side of the road is not cabled, by some odd historical aberration. But thereâs the online version, which I think is called Direct TV. If we had had that I would have been able to watch the new Twin Peaks when it was actually broadcast, instead of now, on DVD, as is actually happening.
Loving it, by the way. And managed to hear no spoilers whatsoever, surprisingly.
-
I mean, better almost anyone than Murdoch. ↩︎
Youâll be pleased to know that we got the battery cover off the Fire TV Stick remote. Got Netflix and iPlayer installed, watched Person of Interest.
In the end we just had to be persistent. And firm.
Burn it With Fire (Stick)
I bought an Amazon Fire TV Stick in the Black/Cyber/Whatever sales, because I thought it would be a good way to watch BBC iPlayer, Netflix, and so on, on the telly, without having to plug a laptop in, as we do at present. Tonight I tried to set it up.
Amazon have decided to use replaceable batteries like itâs the 90s, instead of using a rechargeable like itâs today. I found it literally impossible to open the back of the remote.
The very fact that there are multiple YouTube videos explaining how to open the thing should be a giveaway. Unfortunately they all say, âItâs easy enough now because Iâve opened it before; it was really hard at first.â
The Apple TV may be several times the price, and the remote has its critics. But you just know youâre not going to have bollocks like this when you try to start using it.
Right now Iâm planning to send the Fire TV Stick back. Iâll have another go when more of the family are around, and maybe weâll get it. But I canât help but wonder, what about someone whoâs a bit older and maybe has arthritic hands? This is incredibly bad product design.
It would be weird if Tony Blair turned out to be the hero of the Brexit hour. But we need all the support we can get.
