<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Labourer at the Bitface &#187; economics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://devilgate.org/blog/tag/economics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://devilgate.org/blog</link>
	<description>Warning: contains language from the outset</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:45:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Con/Dem Nation?</title>
		<link>http://devilgate.org/blog/2010/05/13/condem-nation/</link>
		<comments>http://devilgate.org/blog/2010/05/13/condem-nation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin McCallion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Britain today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[id cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libdem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devilgate.org/blog/?p=1130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Betrayed? My initial reaction to the Liberal Democrats&#8217; decision to form a coalition with the Tories was a combination of disappointment and a sense of betrayal (with a side order of impending doom, of course). I was, perhaps, naive. I &#8230; <a href="http://devilgate.org/blog/2010/05/13/condem-nation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Betrayed?</h3>

<p>My initial reaction to the Liberal Democrats&#8217; decision to form a coalition with the Tories was a combination of disappointment and a sense of betrayal (with a side order of impending doom, of course).</p>

<p>I was, perhaps, naive.  <a href="http://devilgate.org/blog/2010/05/05/disappointment/">I said</a> that I was voting LibDem, and that I actively wanted Labour to lose (while stressing that I wanted the Tories to lose even more).  I was, I think, hoping for a hung parliament, which of course is what we got.  But I was labouring (heh!) under the delusion that the LibDems were ideologically relatively close to Labour, and far enough away from the Tories that siding with them would be unthinkable.</p>

<p>Clearly I was wrong.</p>

<p>I had convinced myself that the only reaction of the LibDems to a hung parliament would be to join with Labour; and that seemed like the best possible solution.</p>

<h3>Wasted?</h3>

<p>On election day my friend <a href="http://tonykeen.blogspot.com/">Tony</a> Facebooked to the effect that he had wasted his vote (and it&#8217;s really annoying that, as far as I know, there&#8217;s no way to link to an update or a comment in Facebook).  I answered:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>I don&#8217;t agree. The only way you can waste a vote is to not
  use it. For example I voted LibDem in a safe Labour seat,
  but that isn&#8217;t &#8220;wasted&#8221;. In fact, it would have been more of
  a waste to vote Labour.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>My son made the same point when I told him about that discussion.  Diane Abbott got 54% of the vote in Hackney North and Stoke Newington.  (That&#8217;s a proper majority.)  My vote wouldn&#8217;t have made any difference, though, would it?</p>

<p>But in the days immediately after the election, as Clegg took his party into talks with the hated Tories, I began to regret my decision.  It really felt like I had &#8220;wasted&#8221; my vote; or maybe misused is the better word.</p>

<h3>Things Can Maybe Get Better?</h3>

<p>However the <a href="http://www.libdems.org.uk/latest_news_detail.aspx?title=Conservative_Liberal_Democrat_coalition_agreements&#038;pPK=2697bcdc-7483-47a7-a517-7778979458ff">coalition document</a> that they published today is remarkable.  If you&#8217;ve read any of my political posts over the years, you&#8217;ll know that the biggest thing going on for me for some time has been ID cards, and all the associated post-9/11 terror-panic fallout.  So to read this, from the wordprocessor of the Tories (and LibDems) is remarkable:</p>

<ul>
<li><p>A Freedom or Great Repeal Bill.</p></li>
<li><p>The scrapping of ID card scheme, the National Identity register, the next generation of biometric passports and the Contact Point Database.</p></li>
<li><p>Outlawing the finger-printing of children at school without parental permission.</p></li>
<li><p>The extension of the scope of the Freedom of Information Act to provide greater transparency.</p></li>
<li><p>Adopting the protections of the Scottish model for the DNA database.</p></li>
<li><p>The protection of historic freedoms through the defence of trial by jury.</p></li>
<li><p>The restoration of rights to non-violent protest.</p></li>
<li><p>The review of libel laws to protect freedom of speech.</p></li>
<li><p>Safeguards against the misuse of anti-terrorism legislation.</p></li>
<li><p>Further regulation of CCTV.</p></li>
<li><p>Ending of storage of internet and email records without good reason.</p></li>
<li><p>A new mechanism to prevent the proliferation of unnecessary new criminal offences.</p></li>
</ul>

<p>I mean, that&#8217;s pretty much everything we could want on civil liberties, right there.</p>

<p>And a few other points are good.  As my friend <a href="http://twitter.com/soapyfrogs">Stuart</a> said:</p>

<!-- http://twitter.com/soapyfrogs/status/13853737157 --> <style type='text/css'>.bbpBox{background:url(http://s.twimg.com/a/1273278095/images/themes/theme1/bg.png) #9ae4e8;padding:20px;}</style><div id='tweet_13853737157' class='bbpBox' style='background:url(http://s.twimg.com/a/1273278095/images/themes/theme1/bg.png) #9ae4e8;padding:20px;'><p class='bbpTweet' style='background:#fff;padding:10px 12px 10px 12px;margin:0;min-height:48px;color:#000;font-size:16px !important;line-height:22px;-moz-border-radius:5px;-webkit-border-radius:5px;'>Most important line of the agreement? - We will end the detention of children for immigration purposes. <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23ge10" target="_new">#ge10</a><span class='timestamp' style='font-size:12px;display:block;'><a title='Wed May 12 14:23:57 ' href='http://twitter.com/soapyfrogs/status/13853737157'>Wed May 12 14:23:57 </a> via <a href="http://www.tweetdeck.com" rel="nofollow">TweetDeck</a></span><span class='metadata' style='display:block;width:100%;clear:both;margin-top:8px;padding-top:12px;height:40px;border-top:1px solid #fff;border-top:1px solid #e6e6e6;'><span class='author' style='line-height:19px;'><a href='http://twitter.com/soapyfrogs'><img src='http://a1.twimg.com/profile_images/125558742/cartoonme_normal.jpg' style='float:left;margin:0 7px 0 0px;width:38px;height:38px;' /></a><strong><a href='http://twitter.com/soapyfrogs'>Stuart F Wallace</a></strong><br />soapyfrogs</span></span></p></div> <!-- end of tweet -->

<p>(Gotta keep  embedding those tweets, you know.)</p>

<h3>Dismal Science?</h3>

<p>On the other hand, I&#8217;m no economist; but as <a href="http://devilgate.org/blog/2010/05/05/disappointment/">I said before</a>, I don&#8217;t trust right-wingers to run the economy.  And right now, I have a gut feeling that cutting back on public spending during a recession is exactly the wrong thing to do (cutting back on most public spending is nearly always the wrong thing to do, of course).</p>

<h3>Keep On Keeping On</h3>

<p>In conclusion, <a href="http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2010/05/meet-the-new-boss-same-as-the.html">I agree with Charlie</a>, pretty much.  I don&#8217;t trust the Tories, but let&#8217;s see whether Clegg &#038; co can keep this thing on track.  And let&#8217;s keep a close eye on them all, and keep that list above in mind.</p>

<p>You never know: maybe this really is &#8220;The New Politics&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://devilgate.org/blog/2010/05/13/condem-nation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

