<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Labourer at the Bitface &#187; by-election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://devilgate.org/blog/tag/by-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://devilgate.org/blog</link>
	<description>Warning: contains language from the outset</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:14:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Drink, Sex and Elections</title>
		<link>http://devilgate.org/blog/2006/02/10/drink-sex-and-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://devilgate.org/blog/2006/02/10/drink-sex-and-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin McCallion</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by-election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dunfermline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devilgate.org/blog/2006/02/10/drink-sex-and-elections/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How quickly do events overrun the tardy blogger.&#160; A few weks ago, when Charles Kennedy went public about his drinking, I started writing a piece about him, and his revelations&#8217; potential effect on the Liberal Democrats.&#160; I didn&#8217;t post it that day, and by the following evening things had changed so dramatically that what I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How quickly do events overrun the tardy blogger.&nbsp; A few weks ago, when Charles Kennedy <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4582930.stm">went public about his drinking</a>, I started writing a piece about him, and his revelations&#8217; potential effect on the Liberal Democrats.&nbsp; I didn&#8217;t post it that day, and by the following evening things had changed so dramatically that what I said was almost useless as a post.</p>

<p>Later I started a replacement piece, but I never got round to completing and posting that, either.&nbsp; <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4699862.stm">Today&#8217;s by-election victory</a> is slightly ironic, then, considering that what I was originally saying was&nbsp; mainly that he really had to resign because he had become an electoral liability to his party.&nbsp;&nbsp; Add to that the Lib Dem leadership election and its <em>Shock!  Horror!</em> personal revelations, and many would have expected them to do badly at the polls the next time they had a chance.</p>

<p>And then we get Dunfermline.&nbsp; Which suggests to me that the personal affairs of the actual and potential party leadership are minor items at best in the eyes of the voters.&nbsp; And also that people (in Scotland, at least) have had enough of Blair&#8217;s repulsive Tory-lite policies, and are (not surprisingly) unimpressed by, and suspicious of, Cameron&#8217;s cuddly stealth-Tory aproach.</p>

<p>I hoped, in my original piece, that the Lib Dems would be able to recover from their problems, because they&#8217;re an important force in British politics.&nbsp; Not least because they&#8217;re still the only ones taking a principled stand against ID cards, on which everyone but <a href="http://no2id.org/">No2ID</a> seems to have gone silent recently.&nbsp; Now I&#8217;d have to add the hope that the new guy, Willie Rennie, can get himself established in the Commons in time to vote against the next reading of the Bill.</p>

<p>I never thought that, in my life, I would be toasting a Labour by-election defeat, while at the same time bemoaning their <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4653722.stm">privatisation</a> and (lack of) civil-liberties policies; but we live in interesting times.&nbsp; Times in which Britain desperately needs a third force in politics; and it remains the case — perhaps more so than ever, today — that the Liberal Democrats can be that force.</p>

<p>But I wish they weren&#8217;t needed: I want the <em>Labour</em> party back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://devilgate.org/blog/2006/02/10/drink-sex-and-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
